The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for additional development, including obtaining medical opinions and VA examinations. The issues include compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for amputation of the left foot and leg due to a surgical procedure, service connection for a right hip/leg disorder secondary to lumbar strain with progression to degenerative disc disease (DDD) of L3-4 and/or degenerative arthritis of the left hip, and an increased rating for back disability.
The deciding factor: The claims are remanded as there is insufficient evidence or need for further development regarding the Veteran's service connection claim and compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151.
- Claimed conditions
- amputation of the left foot and leg, right hip/leg disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 23, 2019
- Citation
- 19131093
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,676 · Granted: 24% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19131093.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for additional development due to the need for examinations and opinions regarding her gynecological and right hip/leg disabilities.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining VA and private treatment records, providing corrective VCAA notice on secondary service connection, scheduling a VA examination, and readjudicating the claims.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.