The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to the need for a VA examination to determine if his service-connected bilateral lower extremity disabilities result in anatomical loss or use of both legs above the knee, and to identify any functional limitations.
The deciding factor: The decision requires further evaluation by a VA examiner to assess the Veteran's condition and provide necessary medical opinions regarding his eligibility for higher SMC ratings.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral lower extremity disabilities
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- April 24, 2019
- Citation
- 19131985
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,902 · Granted: 11% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19131985.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's bilateral lower extremity disabilities, including sciatica, are granted on a secondary basis to his service-connected back disability. The Board found that the evidence is in equipoise as to whether the Veteran has been unable to secure or follow gainful employment due to his service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal for financial assistance in the purchase of an automobile or other conveyance and adaptive equipment is remanded due to a duty to assist error. A VA examination is needed to determine if his service-connected disabilities result in loss or permanent loss of use of one or both feet.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for an automobile or other conveyance and adaptive equipment allowance is remanded due to unclear functional loss in his lower extremities resulting from service-connected disabilities. The Board finds a pre-decisional duty to assist error occurred by failing to schedule the Veteran for a VA examination.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran was granted a TDIU from December 10, 2003 to March 24, 2007 due to his service-connected lumbar spine and bilateral lower extremity disabilities preventing him from securing and following substantially gainful employment.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.