The Veteran's claim for service connection for a bilateral eye condition has been denied as new and material evidence was not received. The claims for an effective date earlier than July 23, 2013, for increased ratings of the back disability and service connection for lower extremity radiculopathy have also been denied.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for a psychiatric disability has been remanded as she did not undergo a VA examination to assess her current level of disability. The claims for service connection for chronic allergies and partial hysterectomy have also been remanded.
The deciding factor: No new and material evidence was received to reopen the claim for bilateral eye condition.,The Veteran's claim for increased ratings of back disability and lower extremity radiculopathy has not met the criteria as no earlier effective date is warranted due to lack of evidence showing an increase in severity within one year prior to the June 2014 examination.
- Claimed conditions
- {"condition_name":"Bilateral Eye Condition (Residuals)"}, {"condition_name":"Degenerative Disc Disease with Intervertebral Disc Syndrome (Back Disability)"}, {"condition_name":"Chronic Allergies"}, {"condition_name":"Partial Hysterectomy"}
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 26, 2019
- Citation
- 19132860
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.