The Veteran's claim for an evaluation in excess of 10 percent for residuals, fractured pelvis, symphysis pubis and bilateral ischia with posttraumatic degenerative joint disease was denied. The disability has resulted in symptoms such as painful motion but no limitation of flexion or extension to the extent that would warrant a higher rating.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's hip condition did not result in compensable limitations of motion, thus preventing him from receiving a higher evaluation under any applicable diagnostic codes.
- Claimed conditions
- fractured pelvis, symphysis pubis, bilateral ischia with posttraumatic degenerative joint disease
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- April 26, 2019
- Citation
- 19132875
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,642 · Granted: 19% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19132875.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The veteran's claim for service connection for hyperlipidemia was denied. All other claims were remanded for further development.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for pseudofolliculitis barbae, left hip strain, fractured pelvis, low back disability, heel spurs (right and left), diabetes mellitus, and cerebrovascular accident (stroke) as secondary to diabetes mellitus due to inconsistencies in medical records and need for further examination.
- Dismissed
All claims on appeal have been dismissed as the Veteran withdrew his appeals in February 2016.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has ordered additional development to obtain updated VA treatment records, Social Security Administration records, and service treatment records. The Veteran is also asked to provide a statement regarding symptoms of his claimed pelvic disorder.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.