The Board has not found substantial compliance with previous remand directives regarding the issues on appeal, and thus requires another remand for further examination and clarification of any diagnosed peripheral neuropathy.
The deciding factor: There has been insufficient objective evidence of peripheral neuropathy of the upper extremities in the Veteran's case, despite his testimony and treatment records indicating symptoms. The examiner is requested to clarify whether electrodiagnostic testing is necessary and to determine if any diagnosed condition is related to service or service-connected conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral peripheral neuropathy of the upper extremities
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- April 30, 2019
- Citation
- 19133115
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,836 · Granted: 31% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19133115.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to duty-to-assist errors and insufficient medical opinions regarding the Veteran's service-connected conditions contributing to his death.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II, bilateral peripheral neuropathy of the upper and lower extremities, and tinnitus have been granted.,The Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss are remanded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases due to incomplete information regarding the Veteran's exposure to toxins at Pease Air Force Base. The claims for service connection are intertwined with the claim for diabetes, and further examination is needed after confirming exposures.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's bilateral peripheral neuropathy of the upper and lower extremities is related to his exposure to herbicide agents (including Agent Orange) during service.,The Veteran's left eye macular scar with vision loss, claimed as residuals of shrapnel wound, is related to service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.