Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The Veteran's claim for service connection for a respiratory disorder is denied as the preponderance of evidence does not support a finding that his diagnosed conditions began during service or were related to in-service exposure to an herbicide agent.,The Veteran's claim for an initial disability rating in excess of 50% for PTSD is denied. The Board finds that the severity, frequency, and duration of the Veteran’s symptoms more closely approximate the level associated with a 50 percent rating.,The Veteran's claim for an effective date earlier than November 19, 2007, for service connection for bilateral upper and lower extremity peripheral neuropathy is denied. The preponderance of evidence does not support finding that his condition was secondary to his service-connected diabetes.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's diagnosed respiratory conditions are presumed due to in-service exposure to herbicide agents, but the medical opinions do not support a causal relationship between these conditions and his active service.,The severity of the Veteran’s PTSD symptoms more closely approximates the level associated with a 50 percent rating rather than a higher one. The evidence does not demonstrate the level of impairment required for a 70 percent or higher rating.,The preponderance of the evidence does not support finding that the Veteran's bilateral upper and lower extremity peripheral neuropathy was secondary to his service-connected diabetes.

Claimed conditions
Respiratory disorder, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Bilateral upper and lower extremity peripheral neuropathy
How they argued it
Presumptive (no nexus needed)
Exposure basis
Burn pits / airborne hazards
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
May 1, 2019
Citation
19133975

Veterans Law Judge

R. FEINBERG

Decisions by this judge: 2,017 · Granted: 36% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19133975.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.