Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's TBI has not resulted in higher than level 2 impairment in any facet for rating TBI. The criteria for an initial rating in excess of 40 percent for TBI prior to June 22, 2012 have not been met.,The criteria for a rating in excess of 70 percent for TBI with bipolar disorder and dextromethorphan dependence from June 22, 2012, to April 4, 2013, have not been met. A 100 percent rating for TBI with bipolar disorder and dextromethorphan dependence from April 4, 2013, to June 24, 2013, has been granted.,The criteria for a rating in excess of 70 percent for TBI with bipolar disorder and dextromethorphan dependence from November 1, 2013, to May 23, 2015, have not been met.

The deciding factor: There is no evidence showing that the Veteran warrants a level 3 or higher for any of the facets for rating TBI, as required for a higher rating. The manifestations of two or more conditions cannot be clearly separated.,The record does not suggest impairment more severe than 'deficiencies in most areas,' which is the impairment contemplated by the 70 percent rating. Total occupational and social impairment due to the psychiatric disorder during this period was not shown, and the Veteran is shown to be able to maintain personal hygiene, maintain relationships with family members, and function independently.,The record does not suggest impairment more severe than 'deficiencies in most areas,' which is the impairment contemplated by the 70 percent rating. Total occupational and social impairment due to the psychiatric disorder during this period was not shown, and the Veteran is shown to be able to maintain personal hygiene, maintain relationships with family members, and function independently.

Claimed conditions
Cervical Spine Disorder, Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
May 3, 2019
Citation
19134725

Veterans Law Judge

T. REYNOLDS

Decisions by this judge: 2,077 · Granted: 25% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19134725.

What this means for you

A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.