The Veteran's service-connected conditions, including an aortic aneurysm and associated scars, were granted effective July 7, 2016. The claims for these conditions were reopened due to new evidence submitted by the Veteran.
The deciding factor: The Veteran provided new medical evidence that supported reopening of his previously denied service connection claims for his aortic aneurysm and related scars.
- Claimed conditions
- Aortic Aneurysm, Residuals of Aortic Aneurysm (Scar), Scar of the Left Lower Neck from Aneurysm Surgery, Linear Scars of Anterior Trunk (Midline, Right Upper Chest, and Left Upper Chest), Nonlinear Scars of Anterior Trunk/Epigastric Area from Aortic Aneurysm Surgery
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 100%
- Decision date
- May 9, 2019
- Citation
- 19135936
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,104 · Granted: 28% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19135936.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the claims for service connection for COPD, CAD, aortic aneurysm, and squamous cell carcinoma due to inadequate examinations and lack of confirmation of in-service asbestos exposure.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for OSA, hypertension, cardiomyopathy and hypertensive heart disease with congestive heart failure, aortic aneurysm, and acquired psychiatric disorder (claimed as depression and generalized anxiety disorder) due to the Veteran's in-service conditions.,Service connection is also granted for these conditions on a secondary basis to his service-connected hypertension.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for special monthly compensation (SMC) based on loss of use of both feet, finding that his paraplegia and loss of use of his lower extremities are not related to his service-connected coronary artery disease (CAD).
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings were denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support a compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss, an initial compensable evaluation for aortic aneurysm, or a disability rating in excess of 10 percent disabling prior to April 14, 2005, and 20 percent thereafter, for peripheral neuropathy of the left lower extremity.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.