The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for the left calf donor site scar is dismissed as it became final with the July 1991 rating decision.,The Veteran's claims for earlier effective dates for two deep, non-linear right lower extremity scars and a superficial right lower extremity scar are denied as there was no prior communication indicating an intent to file such claims.,The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for the 30 percent rating for right knee laxity associated with GSW residuals is granted.
The deciding factor: The July 1991 rating decision became final, and no prior communication indicated an intent to file a claim for service connection for the left calf donor site scar.,There was no prior communication indicating an intent to file claims for service connection of two deep, non-linear right lower extremity scars or a superficial right lower extremity scar.,The July 2012 letter from the Veteran was signed and received by VA on July 13, 2012. There is no prior communication indicating an intent to file such claims.
- Claimed conditions
- Left calf donor site scar, Right knee laxity associated with GSW residuals, Right lower extremity scars (deep, non-linear), Superficial right lower extremity scar
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 20%
- Decision date
- May 14, 2019
- Citation
- 19136826
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,030 · Granted: 17% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19136826.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected musculoligamentous strain, right knee, is currently rated at 10 percent and the Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD is granted as the evidence shows a current diagnosis of PTSD, an in-service stressor, and a medical link between the two.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.