Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's claim for service connection for sleep apnea secondary to PTSD has been reopened and granted.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for TBI due to IED blast exposure was denied as there is no current diagnosis of TBI.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for erectile dysfunction secondary to PTSD and/or back injury was denied as the evidence does not show a current disability.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for radiculopathy of left lower extremity secondary to back injury was denied due to lack of current diagnosis.

The deciding factor: New and material evidence has been received, but the claim is still denied as there is no direct link between the claimed conditions and service or a service-connected disability.,The Veteran does not have a current diagnosis of TBI. The evidence submitted since the last denial did not provide any new information regarding this condition.,There is no current diagnosis of erectile dysfunction, thus the claim cannot be granted as there is no established disability to connect with service or a service-connected condition.,There is no current diagnosis of radiculopathy of the left lower extremity. The evidence does not show that the Veteran's symptoms are related to his back injury.

Claimed conditions
sleep apnea, traumatic brain injury (TBI), erectile dysfunction, radiculopathy of left lower extremity
How they argued it
Secondary to another service-connected condition
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
10%
Decision date
May 14, 2019
Citation
19136857

Veterans Law Judge

L. M. BARNARD

Decisions by this judge: 2,456 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19136857.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.