Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The Veteran's bilateral plantar fasciitis, abdominal group XIX muscle strain with spasms, allergic rhinitis, and ovarian cancer are all denied ratings in excess of the current 10 percent. The Veteran is granted a 20 percent rating for stress incontinence beginning October 15, 2018.,The Veteran's painful scars and facial rosacea are both denied ratings higher than the current 10 percent. The Veteran's surgical scars are also denied ratings higher than the current 10 percent. Bilateral ankle and foot cellulitis is not rated as it does not meet the criteria for a compensable rating.,The effective dates for service connection of allergic rhinitis, major depressive disorder, and stress incontinence have all been denied.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's conditions do not meet the criteria for higher ratings under any applicable diagnostic codes. The current 10 percent ratings are deemed appropriate given the Veteran’s symptoms and functional limitations.,The Veteran's scars and facial rosacea do not meet the criteria for higher ratings as they do not have additional characteristics of severity such as instability, deepness, abnormal pigmentation, or adherence to underlying soft tissue loss. The current 10 percent ratings are deemed appropriate given the Veteran’s symptoms and functional limitations.,The effective dates for service connection were denied because there is no indication in the record that these conditions predated the Veteran's separation from active duty.

Claimed conditions
bilateral plantar fasciitis, abdominal group XIX muscle strain with spasms, allergic rhinitis, bilateral lower extremity lymphedema, stress incontinence, ovarian cancer, stage IV, status post complete hysterectomy, painful scars, facial rosacea, bilateral ankle and foot cellulitis
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
May 14, 2019
Citation
19137257

Veterans Law Judge

Nathan Kroes

Decisions by this judge: 882 · Granted: 17% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19137257.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.