The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient rationale in an August 2017 opinion regarding whether lymphoma of the left testicle was caused or aggravated by service-connected bilateral testicular hydroceles. The Veteran's claim for secondary service connection is now pending and requires a clarifying opinion from a qualified genitourinary specialist.
The deciding factor: The remand is due to insufficient rationale in an August 2017 opinion regarding causation and aggravation of lymphoma by bilateral testicular hydroceles.
- Claimed conditions
- lymphoma of the left testicle
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- May 14, 2019
- Citation
- 19137285
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,050 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19137285.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's bilateral testicular hydroceles are found to have clearly and unmistakably existed prior to service but were aggravated during his period of active duty. The issue of lymphoma of the left testicle is remanded for further examination and opinion.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen the claim of service connection for lymphoma of the left testicle. The underlying issue is then considered on a de novo basis, and it is granted.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's headaches are at least as likely as not caused by his service-connected traumatic brain injury, and thus grants service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for hypertension and peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral upper and lower extremities due to insufficient medical opinions regarding their etiology.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.