The Board denied compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for amputations of the left index, middle, and pinky fingers due to a March 2010 VA medical care, finding no evidence of negligence or fault on VA's part.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's amputations were found to be the result of his pre-existing condition (chronic peripheral arterial occlusive disease) rather than VA's carelessness, negligence, or lack of proper skill.
- Claimed conditions
- left index finger amputation, left middle finger amputation, left pinky finger amputation
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 23, 2019
- Citation
- 19139266
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,446 · Granted: 21% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19139266.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected psychiatric condition required his wife to assist him in managing medication and ensuring he did not leave the stove on, as well as helping with daily activities like cooking and money management. The Board found that this necessitated regular aid and attendance due to his cognitive impairment.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining SSA records and VA treatment records.
- Denied
The Board found that the Veteran did not incur an additional disability, including recurrent staph infections, due to a 1982 VA surgery. The opinion from the independent medical expert (IME) concluded it was less likely than not that the Veteran incurred these conditions as a result of the surgery.
- Granted
The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss is rated at 70 percent, and he is granted a TDIU based on his service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.