Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral hammertoes, hypertensive heart disease, PTSD, and major depressive disorder is denied as there is no evidence of a current disability.,Service connection for hypertensive heart disease is denied because the competent evidence does not support an etiological relationship to active military service. The Veteran's hypertension was diagnosed post-service.,PTSD and major depressive disorder are denied due to lack of credible evidence linking these conditions to active military service.,The Veteran's tinnitus claim seeks a rating in excess of 10 percent, but the maximum schedular rating is already assigned under Diagnostic Code 6260.,Non-service-connected pension eligibility is denied as the Veteran did not serve during a period of war.

The deciding factor: There is no current evidence of bilateral hammertoes, hypertensive heart disease, PTSD, or major depressive disorder in service records. The Veteran's conditions are presumed to have developed post-service.,The Veteran was diagnosed with hypertension after service and there is insufficient evidence linking this condition to active military service.,PTSD and major depressive disorder were not diagnosed during service and the Veteran has no credible evidence of a nexus between these conditions and his military service.,The maximum schedular rating for tinnitus (10%) is already assigned, so seeking an increase in rating is not warranted.,The Veteran did not serve during a period of war, thus he does not meet the eligibility requirements for non-service-connected pension benefits.

Claimed conditions
bilateral hammertoes, hypertensive heart disease, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), major depressive disorder
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
May 23, 2019
Citation
19139430

Veterans Law Judge

ROBERT C. SCHARNBERGER

Decisions by this judge: 631 · Granted: 21% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19139430.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.