Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The Veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of mumps has been denied as there is no current disability and the evidence does not support a finding that his current groin pain is related to his in-service mumps.,The Veteran's right knee disability claim was withdrawn at his hearing, thus the issue is dismissed.,Service connection for sleep apnea was denied due to lack of evidence linking the condition to service. The only reported symptoms were snoring and occasional periods of apnea during marriage after service.,Service connection for TMJ was denied as there is no evidence that the Veteran's current TMJ disability is related to his in-service mumps, which is considered a symptom of the same condition.,The Veteran's claim for bilateral pes planus remains pending and requires further examination by VA medical personnel.

The deciding factor: There are no current residuals of mumps found. The Veteran’s current groin pain cannot be linked to his in-service mumps due to lack of evidence supporting such a connection.,The issue was withdrawn at the hearing, thus it is dismissed.,Lack of evidence linking sleep apnea to service and only reports of snoring during marriage after service were provided. The Veteran's wife’s statement lacks credibility as she did not witness any periods of apnea.,TMJ is considered a symptom of mumps which was diagnosed in-service, thus the current disability cannot be linked to service.,The claim for bilateral pes planus requires further examination by VA medical personnel.

Claimed conditions
bilateral pes planus, residuals of mumps, right knee disability, sleep apnea, temporomandibular joint dysfunction (TMJ)
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
May 22, 2019
Citation
19139548

Veterans Law Judge

JONATHAN B. KRAMER

Decisions by this judge: 2,035 · Granted: 30% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19139548.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.