Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's allergic rhinitis is service-connected. The Board found that the Veteran had a current diagnosis of allergic rhinitis and provided competent and credible testimony regarding his symptoms during service.,Service connection for right fifth finger injury was denied due to lack of continuity of care, despite the Veteran's lay statements. A VA examination will be required to address this issue.,The Board found that there is no current evidence of a right knee disorder or low back disorder related to service. An adequate VA examination is needed to clarify these issues.,Service connection for skin disorder was denied due to lack of continuity of care, despite the Veteran's lay statements and testimony regarding his symptoms during service. An adequate VA examination is required to address this issue.,The claim for respiratory disorder was reopened based on new evidence (diagnosis of bronchitis). The Board found that there is a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim with further examination and medical opinion.,

The deciding factor: Service connection can be established if there is a current disability, in-service disease or injury, and a link between the two. The Veteran's allergic rhinitis was diagnosed during service and has persisted since then.,The denial of right fifth finger injury was based on lack of continuity of care despite the Veteran's testimony. A VA examination will be required to determine if there is any current disability related to service.,Right knee disorder and low back disorder were denied due to lack of continuity of care, despite the Veteran's testimony. An adequate VA examination is needed to address these issues.,Skin disorder was denied based on lack of continuity of care, despite the Veteran's testimony. An adequate VA examination will be required to determine if there is any current disability related to service.,The claim for respiratory disorder was reopened due to new evidence (diagnosis of bronchitis). The Board found that there is a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim with further examination and medical opinion.,

Claimed conditions
allergic rhinitis, respiratory disorder (presumed), right fifth finger injury, right knee disorder, low back disorder, skin disorder
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
May 21, 2019
Citation
19139722

Veterans Law Judge

K. MILLIKAN

Decisions by this judge: 961 · Granted: 20% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19139722.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.