The Veteran's claims for service connection and increased rating have been remanded due to the need for further examination and evaluation. The psychiatric disorder claim is also remanded as there are inconsistencies in the medical records.
The deciding factor: Further examination and evaluation are needed to determine the nature, etiology, severity, and relationship of the Veteran's conditions to his service-connected disabilities or any other potential causes.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of an injury to the testes, residuals of trauma to the right leg, epididymo-orchitis, psychiatric disorder (depressive disorder and adjustment disorder)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 3, 2019
- Citation
- 19142667
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,446 · Granted: 21% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19142667.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for service connection for epididymo-orchitis to obtain an adequate medical opinion.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not preclude him from securing or following substantially gainful employment, and the criteria for TDIU have not been met.
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for epididymo-orchitis and a separate rating for varicoceles were denied. The Veteran was granted a separate 10 percent rating for varicoceles, but the claim for an increased rating for epididymo-orchitis was not granted.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for a rating in excess of 10 percent for epididymo-orchitis was denied as the evidence did not show recurrent symptomatic infection requiring drainage or frequent hospitalization, and continuous intensive management.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.