The Veteran's surgical scars of the bilateral upper extremities are currently rated as noncompensable prior to January 20, 2016 and at a maximum of 10 percent thereafter. The Veteran is seeking an increased rating for her left shoulder disability (thoracic outlet syndrome) and entitlement to TDIU.,The Veteran's headache disability has been assigned a maximum schedular rating of 50 percent since the period on appeal began, based on very frequent prostrating attacks that are productive of severe economic inadaptability. The Veteran is seeking an increased rating for her left shoulder disability (thoracic outlet syndrome) and entitlement to TDIU.,The Veteran's left shoulder disability (thoracic outlet syndrome) has been rated as noncompensable since the period on appeal began. The Veteran is seeking a higher rating for this condition, as well as entitlement to TDIU.
The deciding factor: The decision does not provide specific reasoning for the ratings assigned or the decisions made.
- Claimed conditions
- surgical scars, left shoulder disability (thoracic outlet syndrome), headache disability
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- June 4, 2019
- Citation
- 19142782
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,948 · Granted: 29% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19142782.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims regarding entitlement to service connection for a headache disability and entitlement to an initial disability rating in excess of 10 percent prior to May 29, 2014, and in excess of 20 percent thereafter for right tibiofibular ligament strain are being remanded due to the need for additional development.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection on the merits are being remanded due to new evidence and development needs. The maximum disability rating for tinnitus has already been assigned.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the claims for service connection and rating of left lower extremity radiculopathy, headache disability, and bilateral hearing loss due to an error in notifying the Veteran of her right to a pre-decisional hearing.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for various disabilities due to incomplete records and potential errors in the RO decision.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.