Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's tinnitus was granted service connection as it manifested within one year of separation from active duty.,The Veteran's lumbar back strain, left patellofemoral knee disorder, and right hip strain are remanded for further examination and rating considerations.,The Veteran's respiratory disorder is remanded to determine its etiology.,The Veteran's psychiatric disorder (presumed PTSD) is remanded to determine its etiology.

The deciding factor: Service connection granted due to tinnitus as it manifested within one year of separation from active duty and was related to in-service noise exposure.,Remand for further examination and rating considerations due to the Veteran's complaints of pain, weakness, excess fatigability, and lack of coordination during range of motion testing.,Remand for a VA respiratory disorder examination to determine if there is objective evidence of a respiratory disorder that began in or is otherwise related to active duty service, including as due to environmental hazards in the Persian Gulf.,Remand for a VA psychiatric examination to determine if there are objective manifestations of a psychiatric disorder (presumed PTSD) and its etiology.

Claimed conditions
tinnitus, lumbar back strain, left patellofemoral knee disorder, right patellofemoral knee disorder, right hip strain, respiratory disorder (presumed to be bronchitis), psychiatric disorder (presumed to be PTSD)
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
June 11, 2019
Citation
19144812

Veterans Law Judge

B. MULLINS

Decisions by this judge: 1,874 · Granted: 33% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19144812.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.