Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Partly grantedPACT Act

The Veteran's application to reopen his claim for service connection for overactive bladder was denied as new and material evidence had not been received.,The Veteran's application to reopen his previously denied claim of entitlement to service connection for a low back disorder was granted. The claim is reopened, but the issue remains denied.,Service connection for right hip arthritis was denied due to lack of onset in service and no etiological relationship with service.,Service connection for a low back disorder (diagnosed as lumbar arthritis and lumbar intervertebral disc syndrome) was denied. The claim is reopened, but the issue remains denied.,The Veteran's application to reopen his previously denied claim of entitlement to service connection for carcinoma of the larynx was remanded due to lack of evidence regarding in-service exposure.

The deciding factor: New and material evidence had not been received prior to expiration of the appeal period, and subsequent evidence did not relate to an unestablished fact necessary to reopen the claim.,Subsequent evidence related to an unestablished fact (onset in service) that was previously established as lacking. The reopening of the claim does not change the denial of service connection.,The lack of onset in service and no etiological relationship with service were the reasons for denying service connection.,The lack of onset in service and no etiological relationship with service were the reasons for denying service connection, despite the reopening of the claim.,Lack of evidence regarding in-service exposure was the reason for remanding the application to reopen his previously denied claim of entitlement to service connection for carcinoma of the larynx.

Claimed conditions
overactive bladder, low back disorder, right hip arthritis, lumbar arthritis and lumbar intervertebral disc syndrome (low back disorder), carcinoma of the larynx
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
June 17, 2019
Citation
19146822

Veterans Law Judge

B.T. KNOPE

Decisions by this judge: 1,948 · Granted: 29% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19146822.

What this means for you

A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.