The Veteran's skin disorder is remanded for a VA examination to determine its etiology. The Veteran's acquired psychiatric disorder, including PTSD and major depressive disorder, is also remanded for a VA examination to determine whether it is related to his military service.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the Veteran has not been provided with adequate examinations to address his skin disorder and acquired psychiatric disorders due to lack of availability or confirmation of his current address.
- Claimed conditions
- xerosis of the bilateral feet, skin disorder (claimed as rash)
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Burn pits / airborne hazards
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 18, 2019
- Citation
- 19146846
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,676 · Granted: 24% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19146846.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for a skin disorder, finding no in-service incurrence and no link to herbicide exposure. The Veteran's current skin disorders were not shown during service or related to his military service.
- Denied
The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss is not service connected and a compensable rating is denied.,Service connection for the back disorder was previously denied due to lack of evidence linking it to active duty service. The claim has been reopened but new evidence does not establish a relationship with service, thus denial remains.,Service connection for the skin disorder (claimed as rash) and spot on the liver have not been established based on exposure to toxic herbicide agents or any other theory of service connection.,Acid reflux is not service connected and no further theories of service connection are applicable.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for low back, bilateral knee, left ankle, gout, skin disorder (claimed as rash), and cardiovascular disorders. The reasons given were that the Veteran did not have a pre-existing condition prior to service, there was no clear evidence of aggravation during service, and the current conditions are not related to service.,The Board found that the Veteran's low back disorder is due to post-service employment rather than service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for hypertension and skin disorder (claimed as rash) due to insufficient evidence regarding their etiology. The Veteran is service-connected for obstructive sleep apnea, which may be related to his hypertension.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.