The Veteran's appeal for an increased rating for his bilateral fungal infection of the feet is remanded due to deficiencies in the January 2018 VA examiner's opinion. The case must be returned for an addendum opinion addressing additional functional impairment during flare-ups and whether the prescribed medications contain corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive drugs.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the January 2018 VA examination was not in substantial compliance with the December 2017 remand instructions due to insufficient information regarding additional functional impairment during flare-ups and lack of mention of corticosteroid-containing medications.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral fungal infection of the feet
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- June 18, 2019
- Citation
- 19147631
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,893 · Granted: 31% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19147631.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining an opinion from a VA examiner regarding his need for regular aid and attendance due to service-connected anxiety state and bilateral fungal infection of the feet.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for special monthly compensation based on the need for regular aid and attendance of another person is being remanded due to insufficient evidence regarding his ability to perform daily activities without assistance.
- Whole decision: Denied
The veteran's claim for service connection for a fungal infection of both feet was denied as there is no evidence linking the condition to his active duty service. The TDIU claim was also denied due to the veteran not meeting the criteria for total disability rating based on individual unemployability.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The veteran's lung disease claim was denied, but his fungal infection of the feet was granted an increased evaluation to 10 percent with an earlier effective date. The decision is mixed as it includes both a denial and a grant.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.