Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

Service connection for tinnitus, obstructive sleep apnea, right knee strain, PTSD, sinusitis, and rhinitis (bacterial and allergic) is granted.,An effective date prior to February 17, 2016, for the grant of a 10 percent rating for right ankle strain is denied. Service connection for PTSD, sinusitis, and rhinitis (bacterial and allergic) is also granted with an effective date of February 17, 2016.,The Veteran's service-connected PTSD aggravated his obstructive sleep apnea.

The deciding factor: Tinnitus was incurred in service and has continued since then. The Veteran reported that tinnitus began in service and has existed from service to the present.,Obstructive sleep apnea is secondary to service-connected PTSD, as evidenced by a recent study finding an arousal-based mechanism initiated by PTSD that promotes the development of obstructive sleep apnea in trauma survivors. The Veteran's CPAP mask used to treat his sleep apnea increased his psychiatric symptoms and made him feel claustrophobic, anxious, and have panic attacks.,The right ankle strain was not previously service-connected but is now granted with an effective date of February 17, 2016.

Claimed conditions
tinnitus, obstructive sleep apnea, right ankle strain, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), sinusitis, rhinitis (bacterial and allergic), right knee strain
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
June 20, 2019
Citation
19148602

Veterans Law Judge

Vito A. Clementi

Decisions by this judge: 2,242 · Granted: 24% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19148602.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.