The Board has determined that the Veteran's claims for service connection and effective date are remanded due to procedural issues. The initial rating claim for hypertension is denied, as a higher rating is not warranted based on the evidence of record. Separate ratings for seborrheic dermatitis and pseudofolliculitis barbae are requested but not granted.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's claims have been remanded due to procedural issues and lack of clear and unmistakable error (CUE) in previous decisions, as well as the need for further development on his initial rating claim for hypertension. Separate ratings for different skin conditions were not granted because they are considered part of a single disability.
- Claimed conditions
- {"condition_name":"Low back pain"}, {"condition_name":"Invertebral disc syndrome (lumbar spine disability)"}, {"condition_name":"Pseudofolliculitis barbae and psoriasiform dermatitis/seborrheic dermatitis of the groin and nummular eczema with secondary xerosis (skin disability)"}
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 24, 2019
- Citation
- 19149212
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19149212.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for service connection for sarcoidosis as new and relevant evidence has been received since the previous denial.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for service connection for tinnitus to correct a duty to assist error, as the Veteran's lay statements regarding onset and continuity of symptoms were not adequately considered in the previous decision.
- Dismissed
The appeal for service connection for a left-hand condition is dismissed as the Veteran was granted service connection for mononeuropathy to the left hand fourth finger with parasthesia of skin in an October 2025 rating decision.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for unspecified anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder to obtain an adequate medical opinion regarding their etiology.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.