The Veteran's appeal for high cholesterol was dismissed. The Board found that the preponderance of evidence did not support a finding that his low back, left wrist, right wrist, right leg, left leg, or hypertension disabilities began during service or were otherwise related to an in-service injury or disease.,For all other issues, the Veteran's appeals for low back disability, left wrist disability, right wrist disability, right leg disability, and left leg disability were denied. The Board concluded that there was no evidence of a chronic condition in service, no established continuity of symptomatology since service, and no causal relationship between any current disabilities and an in-service injury or disease.
The deciding factor: The preponderance of the evidence did not support a finding that the Veteran's low back disability began during service or was otherwise related to an in-service injury or disease. The Board found that his contemporaneous denial of recurrent back pain upon separation from service had greater probative value than his current report of back pain since service.
- Claimed conditions
- High Cholesterol, Low Back Disability, Left Wrist Disability, Right Wrist Disability, Left Leg Disability, Right Leg Disability, Hypertension
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- June 25, 2019
- Citation
- 19149248
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,374 · Granted: 19% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19149248.
What this means for you
A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the claim of service connection for hypertension, finding that it did not manifest during service and is not causally related to the Veteran's exposure to herbicides or service.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension, finding that there was no evidence of a nexus between his current condition and active duty service or herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board has denied service connection for hypertension and has remanded the issue of an increased rating for skin condition.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has restored the Veteran's 10% rating for hypertension effective December 1, 2025 and denied a rating in excess of 10%. The reduction from 10% to noncompensable was not proper.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.