Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The Veteran's peripheral vascular disease of the right lower extremity has been rated at 20 percent, but is not entitled to a higher rating.,The Veteran's type II diabetes mellitus with erectile dysfunction has been rated at 20 percent, and is not entitled to a higher rating.,Prior to December 13, 2018, the Veteran's sciatic nerve peripheral neuropathy of the left lower extremity was rated at 10 percent. Since then, it has been rated at 40 percent in each leg.,Prior to December 13, 2018, the Veteran's sciatic nerve peripheral neuropathy of the right lower extremity was rated at 10 percent. Since then, it has been rated at 40 percent in each leg.

The deciding factor: The medical evidence does not support a higher rating for the Veteran’s peripheral vascular disease due to the mild impairment demonstrated by his ankle/brachial index of less than 0.9.,The Veteran's diabetes mellitus has been managed with oral hypoglycemic agents and restricted diet, without requiring regulation of activities, thus preventing a higher rating.,Prior to December 13, 2018, the Veteran’s sciatic nerve peripheral neuropathy was rated at 10 percent in each leg. Since then, it has been rated at 40 percent in each leg due to more severe symptoms.,Prior to December 13, 2018, the Veteran’s sciatic nerve peripheral neuropathy was rated at 10 percent in each leg. Since then, it has been rated at 40 percent in each leg due to more severe symptoms.

Claimed conditions
Peripheral Vascular Disease of the Right Lower Extremity, Type II Diabetes Mellitus, Sciatic Nerve Peripheral Neuropathy of the Left Lower Extremity, Sciatic Nerve Peripheral Neuropathy of the Right Lower Extremity
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
June 25, 2019
Citation
19149389

Veterans Law Judge

JAMES L. MARCH

Decisions by this judge: 2,776 · Granted: 24% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19149389.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.