The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder and initial compensable disability ratings for his bilateral knee disabilities, finding that there was no evidence of a current diagnosis related to military service. The appeal is remanded for further development regarding the Gulf War exposure claim.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence did not support a diagnosis of PTSD or any other chronic psychiatric condition related to military service and found that the Veteran's symptoms were more likely due to recent life events, including his daughter's death.
- Claimed conditions
- acquired psychiatric disorder (including posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)), bilateral patellofemoral syndrome
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- July 2, 2019
- Citation
- 19151208
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,500 · Granted: 29% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19151208.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not qualify him for a special home adaptation grant as they do not meet the criteria of blindness in both eyes or anatomical loss or use of both hands due to burn injuries or inhalational injuries.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) as the evidence did not show that she was unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation due to her service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's tinnitus was granted service connection. The remaining claims for psychiatric, back, sciatica, headaches, fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, respiratory disability, and hypertension are remanded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claims for a VA examination and further review due to insufficient evidence regarding his service connection for sleep disorder and acquired psychiatric disorder, including PTSD.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.