Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Denied

The Veteran's claim for service connection for vision loss is denied as there is no current diagnosis of the condition.,Service connection for a lumbar spine condition, claimed as lower back disc problem, is denied due to lack of in-service incurrence and continuity of symptomatology after discharge from active duty.,Service connection for bilateral knee pain is denied because there is no evidence of an in-service injury or disease. The Veteran's statements are too vague to suggest an in-service event or injury.,Service connection for hypertension is denied as the condition did not manifest within one year of separation from service.

The deciding factor: The Veteran does not have a current diagnosis of vision loss, and there is no evidence of such a disability during service. The claim must fail due to lack of a present disability.,There is insufficient evidence to establish an in-service incurrence or continuity of symptomatology after discharge for the lumbar spine condition. The Veteran's statements are too vague to suggest an in-service event or injury.,The Veteran has not provided any lay testimony as to symptoms of vision loss, and there is no evidence of treatment or complaints for bilateral knee pain during service. The claim must fail due to lack of an in-service incurrence.,There is insufficient evidence to establish an in-service incurrence or continuity of symptomatology after discharge for hypertension. The Veteran's statements are too vague to suggest an in-service event or injury.

Claimed conditions
vision loss, lumbar spine condition (lower back disc problem), bilateral knee pain, hypertension
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
July 3, 2019
Citation
19151994

Veterans Law Judge

GAYLE STROMMEN

Decisions by this judge: 2,092 · Granted: 42% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19151994.

What this means for you

A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.