The Veteran's unauthorized medical expenses for January 18, 2013 were denied as the treatment was not in an emergency situation and VA facilities were feasibly available.
The deciding factor: VA facilities were feasibly available to the Veteran and his need for care was not emergent.
- Claimed conditions
- acute daily persistent headache, acute bronchitis, uncontrolled hypertension
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- July 8, 2019
- Citation
- 19152628
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,162 · Granted: 21% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19152628.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and earlier effective dates are remanded due to the need for further development of his medical records. The Board will consider all submitted evidence, including private treatment records, during its review.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's appeal for increased ratings and service connection was partially granted. Service connection was established for a low back disability, left lower extremity radiculopathy, and right lower extremity radiculopathy. The Veteran's claims for higher ratings for his service-connected left hip trochanteric pain syndrome (limitation of extension), limitation of flexion, and limitation of abduction/adduction were denied. His claim for a compensable rating for gastroenteritis was also denied. Service connection for obstructive sleep apnea was withdrawn from the appeal.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection for a respiratory disability and gastrointestinal disability are being remanded due to the need for additional medical opinions regarding the etiology of his conditions, particularly in relation to his participation in TERA during active duty.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a respiratory disability, including chronic cough and acute bronchitis, is remanded due to the need for an adequate medical opinion regarding the etiology of his current respiratory disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.