Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's bilateral plantar fasciitis is not rated higher than 30 percent.,Prior to March 16, 2018, the Veteran’s degenerative joint disease of the right shoulder was rated at 10 percent; since then, it has been rated at 20 percent. The left shoulder condition remains at 10 percent prior to March 16, 2018 and at 20 percent thereafter.,The Veteran's degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine was initially rated as noncompensable but is now rated at 20 percent; his cervical spine condition has been rated at 10 percent since March 16, 2018.,Left knee patellofemoral syndrome and right hip strain with osteoarthritis have both been rated at 10 percent. The left hip strain conditions are each rated at 10 percent prior to March 16, 2018 and at 20 percent thereafter for limited flexion.,The Veteran's right hip strain with osteoarthritis has a separate noncompensable evaluation for limitation of flexion.

The deciding factor: The Board found that the Veteran’s conditions did not meet or approximate criteria for higher ratings based on their current severity and functional impact, necessitating further development to determine appropriate evaluations.

Claimed conditions
bilateral plantar fasciitis, degenerative joint disease of the right shoulder, degenerative joint disease of the left shoulder, degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine, degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine, left knee patellofemoral syndrome, status-post plica excision, right hip strain with osteoarthritis, left hip strain with osteoarthritis
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
July 9, 2019
Citation
19152741

Veterans Law Judge

J.W. ZISSIMOS

Decisions by this judge: 1,612 · Granted: 16% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19152741.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.