Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's claims for service connection for obstructive sleep apnea and headaches have been reopened due to the submission of new evidence that relates to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate these claims.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for hepatitis C has not been reopened as the submitted evidence does not relate to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate this claim.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension has not been reopened due to the lack of new and material evidence.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for skin rashes and skin tumors has not been reopened as the submitted evidence does not relate to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate this claim.

The deciding factor: New evidence, including disability benefit questionnaires from Dr. H.S., supports a finding that the Veteran's obstructive sleep apnea and headaches are related to service-connected conditions (PTSD and diabetes mellitus).,The submitted evidence does not provide new information regarding the etiology of hepatitis C, hypertension, or skin rashes and tumors.,No new evidence has been provided to support a finding that the Veteran's hypertension is related to service.,The submitted evidence does not provide new information regarding the etiology of skin rashes and tumors.

Claimed conditions
obstructive sleep apnea, headaches, hepatitis C, hypertension, skin rashes and skin tumors
How they argued it
Reopened with new and material evidence
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
July 9, 2019
Citation
19152839

Veterans Law Judge

J. GALLAGHER

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19152839.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.