Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's right ankle strain is rated 20% and remanded for further evaluation of his erectile dysfunction, obstructive sleep apnea, lumbar spine disability, and left lower extremity radiculopathy.,Service connection for erectile dysfunction as secondary to service-connected disabilities and service connection for obstructive sleep apnea as secondary to service-connected PTSD are both remanded. The Veteran's ED is not found to be proximately due to his service-connected conditions, but the examiner will need to provide an opinion on whether it was aggravated by them.,The Veteran’s lumbar spine disability remains at 20% and a VA examination is needed to assess the current severity of his left lower extremity radiculopathy.

The deciding factor: The right ankle strain rating needs to be reviewed due to new evidence indicating marked limitation of motion. The issues with erectile dysfunction and obstructive sleep apnea require further evaluation as they may be related to service-connected conditions.,Service connection for ED and sleep apnea are remanded because the current opinions do not address whether these conditions are proximately due or aggravated by service-connected conditions.,The lumbar spine disability remains at 20% but a VA examination is needed to assess left lower extremity radiculopathy.

Claimed conditions
right ankle strain, erectile dysfunction (ED), obstructive sleep apnea
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
July 11, 2019
Citation
19153238

Veterans Law Judge

D. JOHNSON

Decisions by this judge: 1,861 · Granted: 27% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19153238.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.