The Veteran's treatment at UF Health Jacksonville Department of Emergency Medicine on January 7, 2016 was not for a condition that required immediate medical attention due to the lack of significant underlying symptoms. The Board found that a prudent layperson would not have expected delay in seeking medical attention to be hazardous to his life or health.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's abdominal pain and STD exposure were not severe enough to require immediate treatment, as he could have sought care at VA facilities nearby.
- Claimed conditions
- lower abdominal pain, STD exposure, hypospadias
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- July 11, 2019
- Citation
- 19153808
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,454 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19153808.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for erectile dysfunction, lymphedema, incontinence, left upper leg pain, and lower abdominal pain as secondary to the Veteran's service-connected prostate cancer but denied compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for prostate cancer.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a condition manifesting in lower abdominal pain, pelvic pain, and testicle pain and swelling is remanded due to the need for new evidence and an examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to lack of substantial compliance with previous remand directives. The Veteran's genitourinary disorders, including hypospadias and associated conditions like ED, voiding dysfunction, epididymitis, and UTIs, are being reviewed for service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to incomplete development and needs further medical opinions regarding the Veteran's genitourinary disorder, including whether it is a congenital defect or superimposed injury/disease, if it was aggravated during service, and if it began in or is otherwise the result of military service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.