Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's hypertension is denied as not related to service.,His multiple scars of the forehead with slight disfigurement are rated at 10% and no higher rating is granted.,Compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for residuals of spinal fusion is remanded.,The Veteran's PTSD is rated at 70%, but a higher rating is not granted.,An effective date earlier than October 13, 1970 for the award of service connection for multiple scars of the forehead with slight disfigurement and an effective date earlier than December 5, 2013 for tinnitus are denied.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's hypertension was not shown during service or within one year post-service, nor is there evidence to support a finding that it is related to service.,The Veteran does not have visible or palpable tissue loss and either gross distortion or asymmetry of one feature or paired set of features, or; two or three characteristics of disfigurement. Therefore, the 10% rating for multiple scars of the forehead with slight disfigurement is appropriate.,Compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for residuals of spinal fusion requires further review and evidence to determine if it qualifies.,The Veteran's PTSD meets the criteria for a 70% disability rating, but no higher as there are no additional symptoms or disabilities that would warrant such a rating.,There is no legal basis for an earlier effective date for service connection of multiple scars of the forehead with slight disfigurement and tinnitus.

Claimed conditions
Hypertension, Multiple scars of the forehead with slight disfigurement, Tinnitus
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
July 18, 2019
Citation
19155632

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19155632.

What this means for you

A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.