Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Board has determined that additional examinations are needed to determine the nature and etiology of the Veteran's left shoulder disability, right shoulder disability, and hypertension. The examination should also address whether these conditions were caused or aggravated by service-connected disabilities.,The Board has determined that additional examinations are needed to determine the nature and etiology of the Veteran's right shoulder disability and hypertension. The examination should also address whether these conditions were caused or aggravated by service-connected disabilities.,The Board has determined that an additional VA examination is needed to assess the severity of the Veteran’s diabetes mellitus, as his condition may have worsened since the last examination.,The Board has determined that an additional VA examination is needed to determine the current level of disability for the Veteran's service-connected diabetes mellitus.

The deciding factor: The examinations are necessary to provide a thorough rationale and consider all of the evidence of record, including the June 1992 service treatment records regarding the left shoulder.,The examinations are necessary to provide a thorough rationale and consider all of the evidence of record, including the August 1997 service treatment record regarding the right shoulder.,The examination is needed to address whether the Veteran's hypertension was caused or aggravated by his obstructive sleep apnea, as well as secondary service connection due to diabetes mellitus with erectile dysfunction.,The examination is needed to determine if there has been any worsening of the Veteran’s diabetes mellitus since the last examination.

Claimed conditions
left shoulder disability, right shoulder disability, hypertension
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
July 23, 2019
Citation
19156978

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19156978.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.