Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claim for a right arm condition is denied as there is no evidence of an in-service injury or disease, and the current disability is not related to service.,The effective date for the grant of service connection for lumbosacral strain with degenerative arthritis of the spine is denied because the earliest communication prior to November 6, 2014 did not constitute a claim for this condition.,Service connection for bilateral feet disability and bilateral degenerative joint disease/arthritis of the knees secondary to service-connected lumbosacral strain with degenerative arthritis of the spine is remanded due to inadequate etiology opinions in the June 2015 VA examination.,The Veteran's claim for an initial rating in excess of 40 percent for service-connected lumbosacral strain with degenerative arthritis of the spine is remanded as the January 2015 VA Back Conditions Disability Benefits Questionnaire did not provide information on additional limitation of motion due to flare-ups or repeated use over time.,The Veteran's claim for an acquired psychiatric disability is remanded.

The deciding factor: There is no evidence linking the right arm condition to service, and the current disability is not related to service. The effective date cannot be earlier than November 6, 2014 as there was no prior communication constituting a claim for this condition.,The June 2015 VA examination did not provide an opinion on whether the bilateral feet disability and bilateral degenerative joint disease/arthritis of the knees are secondary to service-connected lumbosacral strain with degenerative arthritis of the spine. The opinions need to be updated based on current medical evidence.,The January 2015 VA Back Conditions Disability Benefits Questionnaire did not provide information on additional limitation of motion due to flare-ups or repeated use over time, which is necessary for a fully informed decision regarding an initial rating in excess of 40 percent. A new examination and retrospective opinion are needed.,There was no medical evidence provided by the June 2015 VA examination to support the Veteran's claim for an acquired psychiatric disability. The remand allows for updated opinions based on current medical records.

Claimed conditions
Right arm condition, Lumbosacral strain with degenerative arthritis of the spine, Bilateral feet disability, Degenerative joint disease/arthritis of the knees
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
July 26, 2019
Citation
19158243

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19158243.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.