Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for diabetes mellitus and erectile dysfunction have been dismissed.,His petition to reopen a finally denied claim of service connection for multiple sclerosis has been granted, with the condition that his symptoms are related to Agent Orange exposure. Service connection is granted.,Service connection was established for prostate cancer and diabetes mellitus due to Agent Orange exposure, effective June 19, 2015.,The Veteran's claims for earlier effective dates have not met the criteria.

The deciding factor: The Veteran withdrew his appeals regarding increased ratings for diabetes mellitus and erectile dysfunction in a statement submitted in June 2017. The Board dismissed these issues as withdrawn.,New evidence was received supporting service connection for multiple sclerosis, which is granted due to the presumption of exposure to Agent Orange during service.,Service connection for prostate cancer and diabetes mellitus were established based on the Veteran's exposure to Agent Orange, effective June 19, 2015. The claims are not earlier than this date as they would have required a prior claim within one year of discharge.,The criteria for earlier effective dates were not met due to lack of prior claims and the retroactive nature of the effective date.

Claimed conditions
diabetes mellitus, multiple sclerosis, prostate cancer, erectile dysfunction
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
Agent Orange / herbicides
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
July 31, 2019
Citation
19159398

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19159398.

What this means for you

A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.