The Board has remanded several issues related to the Veteran's service-connected conditions, including her claims for uterine adhesions and impaired lymphatic flow. The initial compensable ratings for her suprapubic/pelvic area scars have also been remanded.
The deciding factor: The Board found that additional evidence is needed to determine whether the Veteran’s current symptoms are secondary to her service-connected conditions or if they warrant separate ratings.
- Claimed conditions
- pelvic inflammatory disease, status post left salpingo oophorectomy for ruptured corpus luteum cyst
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 1, 2019
- Citation
- 19159637
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,316 · Granted: 43% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19159637.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's request for an earlier effective date for her service-connected hysterectomy, finding that the earliest possible effective date is September 24, 2018, as this was the date she filed a claim to reopen her previously denied claim.
- Denied
The Veteran's appeal for higher SMC ratings and a 10% rating based on multiple noncompensable service-connected disabilities is denied. The Veteran is already receiving the maximum allowable compensation for loss of use of a creative organ (female sexual arousal disorder). Her other service-connected conditions do not interfere with her employability.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's TDIU appeal is dismissed because she already has a 100% rating for PTSD, which constitutes total disability.
- Granted
The Veteran's claims for service connection for a gynecological condition, including cervical dysplasia, adenomyosis, endometriosis, pelvic inflammatory disease, and a hysterectomy, have been reopened. The claim of service connection for fainting vasovagal syncope is remanded due to the need for a VA examination.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.