The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection due to outstanding VA medical records from South Carolina VA facilities not yet associated with his case file. The AOJ is instructed to obtain and review these records, issue a new Supplemental Statement of the Case (SSOC), and then adjudicate the claims.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the July 2011 VA examination for hearing loss was inadequate and remanded due to insufficient rationale provided by the examiner. The March 2013 VA examination for seizure disorder also contained contradictions in findings, requiring a new examination.
- Claimed conditions
- Bladder and prostate removal resulting from cancer, Eye disability (glaucoma and cataracts), Hypertension with cardiovascular condition, Gastrointestinal condition, Gum/dental problems
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 1, 2019
- Citation
- 19159672
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,104 · Granted: 28% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19159672.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for an increased rating for left ear hearing loss was dismissed. Service connection for TBI and obstructive sleep apnea, secondary to PTSD, were granted. Service connection for a gastrointestinal condition, secondary to PTSD, was also granted.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for a headache condition and gastrointestinal condition due to potential Gulf War exposure. The VA examiner will be asked to provide an opinion on whether these conditions are related to the Veteran's service, including his exposure to toxic substances during service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a need for another opinion regarding the Veteran's gastrointestinal condition, including GERD and other gastrointestinal symptoms. The claim will be reconsidered with new evidence.
- Partly granted
The Board granted the reopening of service connection for PTSD and denied service connection for a gastrointestinal condition and a respiratory condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.