Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's initial evaluation for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is denied as the condition does not meet the criteria for a higher rating.,The Veteran's hypertension is currently evaluated at 10 percent and no higher, due to lack of readings meeting the criteria for a higher evaluation.,The Veteran's migraine headaches are currently rated at 10 percent and no higher. The claim is remanded as there is no evidence of characteristic prostrating attacks.,The Veteran's residuals of right ankle fracture are currently evaluated at 10 percent and no higher, due to the lack of evidence showing very frequent completely prostrating and prolonged attacks.

The deciding factor: The criteria for an initial evaluation in excess of 50 percent for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) have not been met as there is no evidence of respiratory failure with carbon dioxide retention or cor pulmonale.,The Veteran's hypertension does not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation as there are no readings meeting the threshold for a 20 percent or greater evaluation.,There is no evidence of characteristic prostrating attacks, which are required for an evaluation in excess of 10 percent for migraine headaches. The claim is remanded to allow for further examination and assessment.,The residuals of right ankle fracture do not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation as there is no evidence of very frequent completely prostrating and prolonged attacks productive of severe economic inadaptability.

Claimed conditions
obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), hypertension, migraine headaches, residuals of right ankle fracture
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
August 6, 2019
Citation
19160418

Veterans Law Judge

C. TRUEBA

Decisions by this judge: 1,454 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19160418.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.