The Veteran's lung disability is denied as there was no evidence of a chronic condition in service or otherwise shown to be associated with his active service, including asbestos exposure.,The Veteran's residuals of TBI are denied as the preponderance of the evidence does not support a finding that he has current residuals from an in-service motorcycle accident.,The Veteran's back disability is denied as there was no evidence of a chronic condition in service or otherwise shown to be related to his active service.,The Veteran's right upper extremity, neck, and bilateral lower extremities disabilities are denied as the preponderance of the evidence does not support a finding that they began during active service or were otherwise related to an in-service injury or disease.
The deciding factor: There was no chronic lung disability shown in service or otherwise associated with asbestos exposure.,The Veteran's current residuals from his motorcycle accident are not supported by the evidence, as there is no current diagnosis of TBI and no neurological residuals were found during examination.,No chronic back disability was shown in service or otherwise related to an injury or disease in service.,There is no evidence of a chronic condition in service for the right upper extremity, neck, or bilateral lower extremities disabilities.
- Claimed conditions
- {"condition_name":"lung disability","claimed_conditions":["asbestos exposure"]}, {"condition_name":"residuals of traumatic brain injury (TBI)","claimed_conditions":["motorcycle accident"]}, {"condition_name":"back disability","claimed_conditions":[]}, {"condition_name":"right upper extremity disability","claimed_conditions":[]}, {"condition_name":"neck disability","claimed_conditions":[]}, {"condition_name":"bilateral lower extremities disability","claimed_conditions":[]}
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 5, 2019
- Citation
- 19160420
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19160420.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for obstructive sleep apnea, effective from the date of the February 2025 rating decision.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a medical examination to determine if the Veteran's current neck strain is related to his in-service activities.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a rating in excess of 70 percent for PTSD due to an inadequate medical opinion.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for myasthenia gravis based on the Veteran's exposure to hazardous substances during his military service.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.