The Veteran's appeals for increased ratings for linear appendectomy scars and right wrist disability have been dismissed. The appeal for residuals of appendectomy has been remanded.
The deciding factor: The Veteran withdrew his appeals as to the issues of pain associated with linear appendectomy scars and compensable initial rating for linear appendectomy scars during his hearing before the Board.
- Claimed conditions
- linear appendectomy scars, right wrist triangular fibrocartilage tear (right wrist disability), residuals of appendectomy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 5, 2019
- Citation
- 19160546
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,738 · Granted: 17% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19160546.
What this means for you
A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for various secondary conditions are remanded due to predecisional duty-to-assist errors.
- Granted
The Veteran's annual VA clothing allowance for the HG80 hinged knee brace is granted. However, his claim for an annual VA clothing allowance due to use of hydrophilic and menthol topical creams is denied.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection due to new evidence developed by VA. The Veteran's claims will be returned to the AOJ for further consideration.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical evidence supporting a finding that the Veteran's gastroenteritis caused or aggravated his appendicitis, which led to an appendectomy. The VA examiner is requested to provide additional opinions on these issues.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.