The Veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of a nose fracture has been reopened due to the submission of new and material evidence. However, further development is needed as there are outstanding VA treatment records and personnel records that need to be obtained. Additionally, an additional VA examination is required to determine if any nasal disorder is related to his military service.
The deciding factor: The claim was previously denied because the Veteran's service treatment records were negative for a nasal fracture, but new evidence indicates he may have had such a fracture during service and underwent surgery in 1972. Further examination is needed to confirm this.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of a nose fracture
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 7, 2019
- Citation
- 19161234
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,612 · Granted: 16% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19161234.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases for further development and examination, including to address whether the Veteran's PTSD is related to in-service personal assault(s) or clearly and unmistakably preexisted service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the VA examinations and opinions provided were inadequate to address the Veteran's claims for service connection. The issues of entitlement to service connection have been remanded due to deficiencies in the prior VA examination reports.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities are found to prevent him from securing and following substantially gainful employment, warranting a grant of TDIU on an extra-schedular basis.
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for residuals of a nose fracture, sinusitis with headaches, and allergic rhinitis were denied as they did not meet the criteria for compensable disability ratings.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.