The Veteran's appeal is remanded for further development and consideration of his claims, including the service connection for various disabilities.
The deciding factor: The RO failed to consider new relevant service treatment and military personnel records that were associated with the claims file after the June 2013 rating decision, which rendered moot the issue of the timeliness of the NOD received July 7, 2015. Additionally, further medical opinions are needed for the colon polyps and cervical spine disability.
- Claimed conditions
- {"condition_name":"Back and Left Ankle Disabilities","condition_type":"Disabilities"}, {"condition_name":"Cervical Spine Disability","condition_type":"Disability"}, {"condition_name":"Colon Polyps","condition_type":"Condition"}, {"condition_name":"Diabetes Mellitus","condition_type":"Condition"}, {"condition_name":"Eczema","condition_type":"Condition"}, {"condition_name":"Fatigue","condition_type":"Condition"}, {"condition_name":"Functional Disorder","condition_type":"Condition"}, {"condition_name":"Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)","condition_type":"Condition"}, {"condition_name":"Left Ankle Disability","condition_type":"Disability"}, {"condition_name":"Back Strain (Spondylolisthesis)","condition_type":"Disability"}
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 8, 2019
- Citation
- 19161307
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19161307.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for obstructive sleep apnea, effective from the date of the February 2025 rating decision.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a medical examination to determine if the Veteran's current neck strain is related to his in-service activities.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a rating in excess of 70 percent for PTSD due to an inadequate medical opinion.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for myasthenia gravis based on the Veteran's exposure to hazardous substances during his military service.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.