Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's tinnitus is granted as service-connected.,Service connection for degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine and associated left lower extremity radiculopathy of the sciatic nerve is granted with an effective date of August 28, 2017.,Service connection for bilateral shin splints is remanded due to inadequate medical opinion.,Service connection for bilateral foot disorder, to include plantar fasciitis and bunions, is remanded due to inadequate medical opinion.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's tinnitus was observed during service and has persisted since then. The Board found the Veteran credible in her testimony regarding the onset of tinnitus during service.,Service connection for degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine and associated left lower extremity radiculopathy of the sciatic nerve is granted as there is a positive nexus opinion linking the current condition to service, specifically noting a herniated disc at L5-S1 during service and a March 2011 MRI showing degenerative signal loss from the disc and disc space narrowing.,The November 2017 VA examination found bilateral shin splints but opined that they were less likely caused by in-service shin splints, citing lack of documentation in STRs. The Board finds this opinion inadequate as it does not account for the Veteran's statements regarding her symptoms during service and throughout her military career.,The November 2017 VA examination found bilateral foot disorder but did not provide a nexus opinion linking current conditions to service. The Board finds this opinion inadequate as it did not address the Veteran's statements regarding her symptoms during service.

Claimed conditions
bilateral foot disorder, to include plantar fasciitis and bunions, bilateral shin splints, degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine with associated left lower extremity radiculopathy of the sciatic nerve, tinnitus
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
August 8, 2019
Citation
19161325

Veterans Law Judge

K. MILLIKAN

Decisions by this judge: 961 · Granted: 20% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19161325.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.