Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's claim for a left ankle disorder is denied as there is no evidence of a current disability.,The effective date for the grant of a 10% rating for right ankle arthritis is being remanded due to lack of factual ascertainability within one year prior to December 28, 2015.,The Veteran's claim for a psychiatric disorder is remanded as there are conflicting medical opinions and missing records need to be obtained.,The Veteran's claim for a head injury/ TBI is being remanded due to the lack of an adequate VA examination.,The Veteran's claim for a seizure-like disorder is being remanded due to the lack of an adequate VA examination.,The Veteran's claim for a disability rating in excess of 10% for right ankle arthritis is being remanded as there are insufficient range of motion tests.

The deciding factor: There is no current evidence of a left ankle disorder during the period on appeal.,No factual ascertainable increase in the Veteran's right ankle arthritis occurred within one year prior to December 28, 2015.,Conflicting medical opinions and missing records need to be obtained for an accurate diagnosis.,An adequate VA examination is needed to determine if a head injury/ TBI was incurred during service.,An adequate VA examination is needed to determine the nature of any seizure-like disorder related to service.,Range of motion tests are insufficient, requiring another VA examination.

Claimed conditions
Head Injury/ Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), Left Ankle Disorder, Psychiatric Disorder (including unspecified psychotic disorder, bipolar disorder, anxiety, depression, and schizoaffective disorder), Seizure-Like Disorder
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
August 13, 2019
Citation
19162053

Veterans Law Judge

B. MULLINS

Decisions by this judge: 1,874 · Granted: 33% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19162053.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.