The Board has taken jurisdiction of a claim for Total Disability Rating Based on Individual Unemployability (TDIU) under Rice v. Shinseki, 22 Vet. App. 447, 453-54 (2009), in connection with the Veteran's August 2008 claim for increased ratings for venous insufficiency in her lower extremities. The RO awarded TDIU effective January 25, 2011. However, the Veteran argues that she should be compensated beginning July 7, 2009 as she became too disabled as of this date to work. Further information and clarification from the Veteran is necessary to establish when her employment ended and to determine her employment status between June or July 2009 and January 25, 2011.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's employment with Columbus City Schools ended on January 25, 2011. However, she argues that she stopped working due to her service-connected disability in either June or July 2009, when she had to go on medical leave and received a payout of her accrued leave.
- Claimed conditions
- venous insufficiency
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- August 12, 2019
- Citation
- 19162259
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,863 · Granted: 26% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19162259.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board granted service connection for multiple conditions, including an acquired psychiatric disorder, sleep apnea, hypertension, and various musculoskeletal and skin disabilities.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for multiple conditions, including IBS, venous insufficiency, a lung condition, liver condition, GERD, right and left hand conditions, upper extremity neuropathy, kidney condition, and obesity. The claims for bilateral shoulder strain, bilateral flat feet, plantar fasciitis, bone spurs, and arthritis; left knee strain and instability; right knee strain and instability; left ankle condition; right ankle condition; hypertension; erectile dysfunction; allergic rhinitis; obstructive sleep apnea; tension headaches; heart condition; depression; and anxiety were remanded for further development.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The Board granted a 30 percent disability rating for the Veteran's service-connected vertigo and remanded the claim for service connection for venous insufficiency.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further examination and consideration of the Veteran's left ankle disorders, including skin discoloration and venous insufficiency. The issues include determining if a rating in excess of 20 percent is warranted for the left ankle disorder and whether there should be separate ratings for the skin condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.