Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's diabetes mellitus is rated at 20 percent, but the Board finds that it does not warrant a higher rating.,The Veteran’s peripheral neuropathy of the upper and lower extremities are currently rated at 10 percent each. The Board has found no basis for a higher rating based on the current evidence.,The Veteran's cataracts are rated at 0 percent, as they do not meet any criteria for a higher rating under Diagnostic Code 6027 or other relevant codes.,Issues related to PTSD, TDIU, and DEA benefits have been remanded.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's diabetes mellitus does not require regulation of activities as part of its management, thus preventing a higher rating under Diagnostic Code 7913. The evidence does not support a finding that the disability has reached the level required for a 40 percent rating.,The objective evidence shows moderate impairment resulting from the neurological symptoms of the bilateral upper and lower extremities associated with diabetes mellitus, but not greater than what is currently rated at 20 percent for each extremity. The Veteran's subjective complaints do not warrant higher ratings based on his reported symptoms.,The Veteran’s cataracts are rated under Diagnostic Code 6027, which rates preoperative cataracts based on visual impairment. Given the current evidence and lack of further unaddressed complications, no basis exists for a higher rating.,Issues related to PTSD, TDIU, and DEA benefits have been remanded due to insufficient evidence or procedural issues.

Claimed conditions
diabetes mellitus, peripheral neuropathy of the left upper extremity, peripheral neuropathy of the right upper extremity, peripheral neuropathy of the left lower extremity, peripheral neuropathy of the right lower extremity, cataracts
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
August 13, 2019
Citation
19162613

Veterans Law Judge

Harvey P. Roberts

Decisions by this judge: 2,645 · Granted: 19% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19162613.

What this means for you

A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.