The Board has granted earlier effective dates of November 30, 1993 for the award of service connection for a neurological impairment, to include peripheral neuropathy with essential tremors, of both the right and left upper extremities.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's claim implicitly encompassed an informal service connection claim for tremors under VA regulations governing effective dates for the award of service connection.
- Claimed conditions
- neurological impairment, peripheral neuropathy with essential tremors
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- August 13, 2019
- Citation
- 19162633
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,199 · Granted: 25% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19162633.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical opinions and potential non-compliance with procedural requirements.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to conflicting medical opinions and a need for an independent medical expert's opinion to determine if the Veteran's bladder dysfunction is caused or aggravated by his service-connected lumbar spine disability.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a right wrist disorder is being remanded due to new evidence received since the final denial in March 1987. The Board also finds that additional VA treatment records and SSA records are needed for proper evaluation of his claims.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to the need for a VA neurology examination to assess his service-connected left wrist disability and any related neurological impairment.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.