Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional examinations and opinions.,The Veteran's claim for a compensable rating for hemorrhoid residuals is being remanded as there may be an additional separate disability evaluation warranted under another diagnostic code.,The Veteran's claims for left knee and right knee disabilities are being remanded due to insufficient evidence of in-service events or diagnoses.,The Veteran's claim for a left ear disability is being remanded due to insufficient evidence of in-service events or diagnoses.,The Veteran's claim for bilateral hand disabilities is being remanded due to insufficient evidence of in-service events or diagnoses.,The Veteran's claim for right-sided flank pain is being remanded due to insufficient evidence of in-service events or diagnoses.

The deciding factor: Additional examinations and opinions are needed to determine the severity of the back disability, assess the nature and extent of any impairment of sphincter control, evaluate the presence and etiology of left and right knee disabilities, determine if there is a current left ear disability with associated functional impairment, ascertain whether there is a current hand disability related to service, and decide if there is a current right-sided flank pain condition related to service.,Additional examinations are needed to assess the severity of the hemorrhoid residuals and determine if an additional separate compensable rating can be assigned under another diagnostic code.,Additional examinations are needed to evaluate the presence and etiology of left and right knee disabilities, determine if there is a current left ear disability with associated functional impairment, ascertain whether there is a current hand disability related to service, and decide if there is a current right-sided flank pain condition related to service.,Additional examination is needed to assess the nature and etiology of any diagnosed left or right knee disability, including bilateral patellar spurring. Additional examination is also needed to determine the presence and etiology of the claimed left ear disability. Additional examination is also needed to determine the presence and etiology of a current hand disability related to service. Additional examination is also needed to determine if there is a current right-sided flank pain condition related to service.,Additional examinations are needed to assess the nature and extent of any impairment of sphincter control, evaluate the presence and etiology of left and right knee disabilities, determine if there is a current left ear disability with associated functional impairment, ascertain whether there is a current hand disability related to service, and decide if there is a current right-sided flank pain condition related to service.,Additional examinations are needed to assess the nature and extent of any impairment of sphincter control, evaluate the presence and etiology of left and right knee disabilities, determine if there is a current left ear disability with associated functional impairment, ascertain whether there is a current hand disability related to service, and decide if there is a current right-sided flank pain condition related to service.

Claimed conditions
lumbar strain with degenerative joint disease, residuals of a hemorrhoidectomy, left knee disability, right knee disability, left ear disability (manifested by pain, to include chronic suppurative otitis media), bilateral hand disability (manifested by pain, to include tenosynovitis), disability manifested by right-sided flank pain
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
August 14, 2019
Citation
19163043

Veterans Law Judge

U. R. POWELL

Decisions by this judge: 2,374 · Granted: 19% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19163043.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.